Monday, December 12, 2011

Right Wing Gun Owner Defaces Scott Walker Recall Petition

via The Daily Kos

According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel online, the man who defaced two Wisconsin recall petitions last weekend has been arrested and charged with two felony charges of "Election fraud - falsifying or destroying nomination papers, recall petitions, etc."
Posing with his finger on the trigger, here we have another example of your average, typical law-abiding gun owner. When confronted with something he disagrees with, he loses it and acts like an idiot.

What's your opinion? Please leave a comment.

18 comments:

  1. You can't call him law abiding if he committed a felony, and you can't call him average unless you've got data to support that claim.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, Greg, you can call him law abiding if he has no prior record and so long as he has not been convicted, only arrested so far.

    He is just one of the many Wisconsin gun loon conservatives who have defaced recall petitions, proving once again how conservatives want civil and political rights for themselves, but willingly trample on them for other people. RedAz comes to mind as someone who is against equal rights for everyone.

    It also shows yet again how some men need a gun to feel brave and strong because they are in reality cowardly and weak. You Greg strike me as an excellent example of that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "You can't call him law abiding if he committed a felony, and you can't call him average unless you've got data to support that claim."

    But you can issue him a handgun permit without knowing anything about his mental state? The more I hear from gunzloon Greg Camp the more I realize just how delusional he really is.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Democommie,

    I don't care about mental states. I care about what a person does. Your mental states are your own business, and I don't want to violate your privacy.

    Dog Gone,

    I suppose that you have an objective standard for bravery and strength? Or are you just expressing your feeling about me?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Greg:
    I don't care about mental states

    What's mens rea, Greg?

    You may not care about mental state, but the law does, Greg.

    It's so funny hearing you expound upon the law, greg, when it's so obvious that you have no idea of what all is involved.

    ReplyDelete
  6. GC writes;Dog Gone,
    I suppose that you have an objective standard for bravery and strength? Or are you just expressing your feeling about me?


    Yes I have objective standards for courage and bravery, and not just physical strength, but also strength of character.

    And no, you don't measure up. You have yet to provide a single credible source for your claims, you demonstrate, routinely your lack of critical thinking skills, and you demonstrate a lack of humanity, knowledge of ethical thinking, and just plain poor sense.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Laci the Dog,

    Mens rea--literally the mental thing. It's the quality of someone who is responsible for his own actions. Someone who is legally insane lacks mens rea. This applies to legal cases, but what about when no crime has been committed? Until a person commits a crime, it's none of my business what's going on in his mind.

    Dog Gone,

    So again, you don't offer us your standard; you merely tell us that you have it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Greg Camp:

    You don't care about mental states? Really? I mean I can see where you might not like to have to deal with someone looking at your blogpic and saying, "That guy has fucking gunz? Holeeeee SHIT!".

    ReplyDelete
  9. Looking at this clown's photo I see a guy who's in LOVE with the idea of "stickin' it to" whoever messes with his shit. The problem with guys like him is that he's going to be find himself in a situation, sooner or later, where if a gun is available, it will be used. Then it's really too late to do anything about what HAD been an avoidable shooting.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I called him "typical and average" just to get a rise out of our gun-slingers.

    I do think there are too many like him among you.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Mikeb302000,

    But I doubt we'll see Dog Gone insisting that you provide support for your assertion. She has no objection to feelings over facts when she agrees with the feeling.

    ReplyDelete
  12. GC writes:
    But I doubt we'll see Dog Gone insisting that you provide support for your assertion. She has no objection to feelings over facts when she agrees with the feeling.

    Untrue. I clearly understand the difference between fact and feelings, and when I support or agree with feelings it has a basis in fact supporting it - facts which I consistently provide, with credible sources.

    You know- UNLIKE you Greg.

    But this kind of statement is an example of why we see you as a weak whiny human being who can't compete with intellect and fact.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Dog Gone,

    Mikeb asserted that there are too many gun owners like the one featured in this article. I don't see you demanding that he provide a citation and hard numbers for that claim, nor do I see you challenging his definition of too many. That's why I say that you're a hypocrite. You'll take claims from your side without evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  14. That info has been posted over and over here; I don't need MikeB to do so again.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Dog Gone,

    So in your view, the plural of anecdote is data?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Greg Camp:

    "Dog Gone,

    So in your view, the plural of anecdote is data?"

    No, fuckhead, the plural of anecdote is anecdotes. The plural of "lie" is "lies". You are quite familiar with the latter, having employed them on most threads in which you've left comments.

    When one walks into a ongoing conversation the requirement for bringing them "up to speed" is not the responsibility of those who are already in that conversation.

    That you're sitting there with your lower lip quivering and your being in its entirety wishing, just WISHING that you could whip out your hogleg and shoot the mean, Mean MEANIES who are laughing at your pathetic attempts to justify your idiotic practices re: teh gunz--well that's ALSO your problem.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Demo, you just helped to explain why Greg knows the difference between "lay" and "lie"--it's because he lies all the time.

    Otherwise, he doesn't know much of anything else.

    And while he likes to say we are "know it alls"--it isn't so much that we are "know it alls" as much as he doesn't know shit.

    ReplyDelete
  18. All right, Greg, let me clarify that vague remark of mine that there are too many unfit gun owners.

    There are WAY too many unfit gun owners.

    ReplyDelete